Bekta Class (3.0.7) (Removed)
posted on September 21st, 2009, 6:10 pm
Last edited by Tyler on February 15th, 2010, 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A Klingon warship somewhere between the Vor'cha and Negh'Var Class. Because of that, it has a weapons array similar to the Vor'cha Class (a Disruptor and a Poleron Torpedo). The Disruptor is stronger than either of the 2 other designs, but not as strong as the Negh'Vars Disruptor and Ion Torpedo combined.
posted on September 21st, 2009, 6:14 pm
Last edited by Tyler on October 18th, 2009, 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A second version that has a more 'armored' look. I don't really like this one, so I made it into a seperate version rather than a rank-up of the other one.
It can be easily modified to serve as a veteran version, because this one uses different textures.
One more thing I forgot in the first post: Both of these have the original readme.
It can be easily modified to serve as a veteran version, because this one uses different textures.
One more thing I forgot in the first post: Both of these have the original readme.
posted on September 21st, 2009, 6:19 pm
I like V2 Better... though can I suggest some adjustments? (I'll release the adjusted version later...)
posted on September 22nd, 2009, 7:16 pm
thanx ty,nice job 

posted on October 18th, 2009, 12:41 pm
Quoted directly from the ReadMe: "Ask if you'd like to use this in a project. I'd rather people not assume they can do as they please."
I don't recall having read any e-mail, nor knowing about this model being released for FO. Care to explain?
I don't recall having read any e-mail, nor knowing about this model being released for FO. Care to explain?
posted on October 18th, 2009, 2:12 pm
Last edited by Tyler on October 18th, 2009, 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
... I didn't see that part... Should I remove it?
posted on October 18th, 2009, 2:23 pm
Probably a good idea Tyler, if only to wait until you get an email back 
Although it isn't really part of a project, the readme does specify that the vessel isn't free to use ... so best to respect those wishes

Although it isn't really part of a project, the readme does specify that the vessel isn't free to use ... so best to respect those wishes

posted on October 18th, 2009, 6:23 pm
Do you not take notice of ReadMe files?Tyler wrote:... I didn't see that part... Should I remove it?
You're assuming he ever sent out an e-mail.Dominus_Noctis wrote:Probably a good idea Tyler, if only to wait until you get an email back
posted on October 18th, 2009, 7:18 pm
Last edited by quaddmgtech on October 18th, 2009, 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aerilon wrote:Do you not take notice of ReadMe files?
You're assuming he ever sent out an e-mail.
Aerilon, seeing as you are fairly new to the forums I will simply suggest a little more tact in the future. Tyler is a well respected member of this community and I doubt highly that his intention was to violate the terms of use for any intellectual property. Seeing as this is a completely non-commercial utilization I fail to see the need to jump down people's throats... I'm sure Tyler will give credit where credit is due.
(EDIT) And I see from your other posts that you are actually not new... so welcome back, but I stand by my original statement above.
posted on October 18th, 2009, 7:26 pm
[quote="quaddmgtech"]
Aerilon, seeing as you are fairly new to the forums I will simply suggest a little more tact in the future. Tyler is a well respected member of this community and I doubt highly that his intention was to violate the terms of use for any intellectual property. Seeing as this is a completely non-commercial utilization I fail to see the need to jump down people's throats... I'm sure Tyler will give credit where credit is due.
Yeahhhhhh
Sorry had to do it
Aerilon, seeing as you are fairly new to the forums I will simply suggest a little more tact in the future. Tyler is a well respected member of this community and I doubt highly that his intention was to violate the terms of use for any intellectual property. Seeing as this is a completely non-commercial utilization I fail to see the need to jump down people's throats... I'm sure Tyler will give credit where credit is due.
Yeahhhhhh

Sorry had to do it
posted on October 18th, 2009, 7:28 pm
quaddmgtech wrote:Tyler is a well respected member of this community and I doubt highly that his intention was to violate the terms of use for any intellectual property.
Please, don't you think they can take care of that for themselves?
(Btw: What kind of argument is that please? He's respected and that's why he doesn't have to check ReadMes before releasing something? C'mon... :rolleyes: Tyler apologized and Aerilon made his point, the rest is up to them.)
posted on October 20th, 2009, 7:43 pm
The Old Man wrote:Please, don't you think they can take care of that for themselves?
(Btw: What kind of argument is that please? He's respected and that's why he doesn't have to check ReadMes before releasing something? C'mon... :rolleyes: Tyler apologized and Aerilon made his point, the rest is up to them.)
Whatever, just doing my best to make sure no-one gets stone walled.
posted on November 6th, 2009, 9:34 pm
Regardless of what has, or hasn't happened, Tyler used this ship, without asking to do so. Some would consider it polite, no? I specifically asked in the file readme to be notified, I wasn't.quaddmgtech wrote:Aerilon, seeing as you are fairly new to the forums I will simply suggest a little more tact in the future. Tyler is a well respected member of this community and I doubt highly that his intention was to violate the terms of use for any intellectual property. Seeing as this is a completely non-commercial utilization I fail to see the need to jump down people's throats... I'm sure Tyler will give credit where credit is due.
I worked on, and uploaded this ship on A2Files some time ago, I was never contacted for its release on FleetOps. Regardless of Tyler's community status, if he is as respected as you say he is, I should have recieved that e-mail from him.
If I had been asked, it is more than likely I'd have allowed the conversion to take place. However, I don't appreciate seeing work I've spent time on, released elsewhere, with no notification.The Old Man wrote:(Btw: What kind of argument is that please? He's respected and that's why he doesn't have to check ReadMes before releasing something? C'mon...Tyler apologized and Aerilon made his point, the rest is up to them.)
A2Files has had a fair amount of trouble with people using others work without their knowledge / say so, and I've been involved with that a number of times (I used to be staff there). It annoys me when people can't be politce and ask. An e-mail doesn't take five minutes.
I've made my point anyway, and shall stand by it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests