It's finally appropiate to piss on a grave.

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 1:41 am

That and it was done within 24 hours in accordance with Islamic Tradition.  The idea behind this was not to infuriate Muslims the world over, but to do the job we've been trying to do for 10 years, get it done cleanly, and have it been over with without pissing off more people.

The irony is some parts of the Muslim world are STILL rioting over it (Mostly the same parts that cheered on 9/11

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 1:44 am

Actually the way that it was done prevented anyone from asking for the body so its prolly for the best and disposing of it in the ocean prevents anyone from really being able to find it.

Actually it was done to prevent bin Laden's grave site from becoming a "terrorist shrine".

I'm glad the bastard is dead.  The world is a much better place without him.  I just can't believe where he was hiding out - I mean a f***in million dollar mansion walking distance from a military academy?  And no one in the Pakistani government thought that a million dollar mansion surrounded by 12-18ft walls lined with barbed wire and armed guards protecting the only two entrances, with no outside windows, and the residents inside burning their garbage instead of leaving it for the garbage man, qualified as suspicious?  Pakistan had to have known something.

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 3:30 am

@Nero still kinda what i said it doesnt matter i would have been really cool with leaving him to rot in a jail cell for the rest of his misrable life too. Solitary Confinement see what he though of that for a while.

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 4:16 am

Good to see its done.

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 5:10 pm

That and it was done within 24 hours in accordance with Islamic Tradition.  The idea behind this was not to infuriate Muslims the world over, but to do the job we've been trying to do for 10 years, get it done cleanly, and have it been over with without pissing off more people.

100% true

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 10:29 pm

You ask me, his body should have been bathed in pork blood THEN dumped.

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 10:33 pm

  you watch too much Glen Beck(not saying I don't occasionally either )

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 11:31 pm

As much as this guy is disgusting to me he is a small man we have spent way to much time and money on.

Hating hate dose not = love.

The more time we spend on him the more it puts interests over seas at risk. Let him stay dead and move on!

Guess who's NOT coming to dinner.

posted on May 3rd, 2011, 11:39 pm

Well Tokra no one did ask you, maybe next time we will or not

posted on May 4th, 2011, 8:25 am

yeah tokra, i'd hate to think you actually meant that and werent trolling.

Desecrating someone's religion isnt a solution to any problem. You criticise him for evil acts yet propose hate crimes as revenge. if i thought heaven and hell existed you and osama would both be down in hell.

posted on May 4th, 2011, 10:57 pm

I have to say I agree wholeheartedly with this:

“I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.”
—
Martin Luther King, Jr.

Sorry to down anyone's day, but I would have been a thousand times happier if he had been caught, put on trial and sent to prison.

posted on May 6th, 2011, 6:37 am

Good, I hope they get Bush next...

posted on May 6th, 2011, 6:04 pm

Did you seriously just compare Bush to Osama bin Ladin?   I mean, come one, I understand people don't like him, I for one don't agree with alot that he did, but seriously!?  Comparing a president and a generally good guy to a mass murderer and terrorist?

I bet you would never hear someone compare President Obama to Osama...(even if it gets hard not to confuse their names. )

posted on May 6th, 2011, 6:08 pm

an argument against bush is that he started wars which killed people on the scale of the attacks the bin laden has ordered.

both are commanders, both have ordered people to fight and die in what some people from both sides believe are unjust wars.

bush was voted in, maybe al qaeda had a vote to decide who would be their leader

they are more comparable than most would like to admit.

[Anonymous]

posted on May 6th, 2011, 6:15 pm

Last edited by Anonymous on May 6th, 2011, 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

No, actually I would say they are about as comparable as Obama and Hitler.  And yeah, I am saying they are not at all.  Just because they ordered the killing of people doesn't mean they are the same.  Osama, killed people himself, but most importantly, he killed innocents.  In America, the president does not get to decide to start a war, the Congress does.  And he doesn't decide the tactics either.  His generals advise him on what to do, but generally they pick the best action.  So, with all of this yeah maybe you could say that bush was responsible for the war, but he still did not personally order the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians as Osama bin Ladin did.  He allowed the military to fight back against those who took arms against them.  It is completely different.  The comparison is a very thin line at best, and the same comparison could be drawn to every ruler of any country that ever went to war.  Osama was an evil man.  Bush, no matter what you think he did, was most certainly not.