Level 2 Excelsior rear torpedo special weapon firing bug

Program aborts? Network configuration? Graphic errors? Bugs? Post your question here.
posted on September 21st, 2009, 10:59 pm
Last edited by DOCa Cola on September 22nd, 2009, 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
That is why I don't title my posts with an outline of what is in them :lol:

The 1 silver bar excelcior, when using its rear torpedo launcher, uses all the special energy faster than an eye can properly follow. It also seems that no torpedos are shot, but it might be so fast I can't see. It only seems to be with excelsior level 2, but all it  takes is one ODF to glitch.

(Mabey now they will survive long enough to get a gold bar...)
posted on September 21st, 2009, 11:05 pm
The odf files say that the second Torpedo only has a foward arc on all levels, shouldn't be any SE gone...
posted on September 21st, 2009, 11:07 pm
Hmm, well I did not read the ODF, but the special energy is munched in 40 energy bunches, that being assumed because I can see yelow then red, and the red is 20/140. Probably no torpedos are launched from this rear munching then...
posted on September 21st, 2009, 11:17 pm
Yup, I can confirm that it does eat up the special energy even though no torpedoes are fired at any level from the rear.  :sweatdrop:
posted on September 21st, 2009, 11:21 pm
Even Veteran? Mabey that is why the antimatter storage ability seems useless. I found it when shooting my own shipyard, and all the ones I tested it with were level 2... I don't think I had anything else.
posted on September 21st, 2009, 11:57 pm
Even Veteran (although I did test really quickly, soo I could be wrong :) )
posted on September 22nd, 2009, 7:00 am
that was actually a small bug, that has been fixed :) thanks for reporting
posted on September 22nd, 2009, 5:29 pm
I see... Sorry for Caps lock, I always post with the title as a realy vague yet related thing, but this one I decided not to, but how it came out was rediculous :). The Capslock wasn't supposed to make it seem big, or even attempt to make people look at it more. Actualy, probably less people did because of it  :whistling:
posted on September 22nd, 2009, 5:56 pm
no problem :thumbsup:
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests