Creationism and Evolution Debate

posted on September 26th, 2010, 10:30 pm

DNA is a very specific set of instructions.  And whenever you have a mutation, you always have a loss of information.  Never a gain of information.  That has been scientifically proven.  DNA never has a gain of information.  The "brown eyes vs blue eyes" argument does not prove evolution.  Instead, it just shows variations within the species, but the species is preserved.  Not changed into a different species.

TCR one question: do you think god created domesticated animals as well?

because animal husbandry kind of prooves the posibility of one race turning into another...

posted on September 26th, 2010, 10:59 pm

And back again, sorta.  Wolf to Dog to Dingo.

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:00 pm

I prefer Pig to Bacon to My Mouth to My Poo.


 

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:09 pm

I prefer Pig to Bacon to My Mouth to My Poo.


  

@ loki

Its funny would would say that, as Microevolution is not just a term to describe what portions of evolution creationists believe.  It is the an example of animal domestication, as was suggested.  It CAN NOT change species of animals unless mutation happens, which does happen, but most mutations die very quickly.  not to mention the fact that if a mutation were to mate with something, it would be a member of its origional species, meaning it doesn't change the species at all.  a 5 legged dog will either die out, or mate.  if it mates, it will not be with another 5 legged dog, it will be with a 4 legged dog, and it will produce 4 legged dog.  Mutation is not passed through generation to generation unless there are two of the recessive genes.

A dog is a dog, no matter what breed.  Interspecial relations is not something we see happen/ survive.  Not naturally anyway. 


Macro-evolution is the Evolution which supposedly changed man from single celled organizms to what we are today, and what we have been for the past 6,000 years.  But, of course, with evolution, we are due for a change right?



Bring on the X-men!!

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:17 pm

Ah this thread is filling up with so much fail, soon it will collapse into its own blackhole. I can't wait  CERN will be sooooo outdone

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:18 pm

Here we go...proof that not only does evolution happen, but that it can change one species into another. In this case, a fish into a giant dragon thing...

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:20 pm

...Speaking of Fail.

if thats your proof, then no wonder Creationists have a problem with Evolution.

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:22 pm

if thats your proof, then no wonder Creationists have a problem with Evolution.

Well that's their problem....I know the truth 

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:23 pm

Well... I am fond of 8472...

...EVOLVING...

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:24 pm

Ask any creationist:


  You don't wanna evolve your Exeggute before level 37 at the earliest.  That way it can learn Sleep Powder.  If you're the patient type you can wait until 43 to learn Solar Beam as well.  That way you can teach it Sunny Day so it Fires Solar Beam with no preparation and gets double speed!



   Then evolve it into Exeggutor and teach it TM 29 - Psychic

You've got a lean, Green, Psychic type-machine

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:29 pm

Wow, Boggz.  You have totally lost me.  This kind of Science is far beyond my experience.

...I am not worthy...

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:29 pm

And don't forget that evolution can also sometimes be achieved through the giving of a creature from one person to another...this is proven fact.

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:35 pm

What about moon rocks huh?

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:36 pm

What about moon rocks huh?

Moon stones!! You can't just use any old rock from the moon you know!

posted on September 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm

What about moon rocks huh?

 Moon STONES, young Dominus.


 They evolve mostly worthless creatures that can't fight properly or have negligible battling potential.  As this is a thread built on reference and evidence, I offer this:

 Awesome but Impractical.