Guide Problems/Errors

guide.fleetops.net
1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
posted on May 25th, 2011, 6:41 pm
Thank you guys :) Should be corrected now  :thumbsup:
_Zap_
User avatar
posted on May 26th, 2011, 1:16 pm
Last edited by _Zap_ on May 26th, 2011, 1:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
found more... :D

-Dominion Database: Hyperspace Artillery should be Strategic range, not Artillery
-Fed Database: Teutoburg says just "other" as range.
-Fed Unit analysis, Ventures Special contains a typo ("rang" instead of "range")
-Fed Unit analysis, Phalanx class description refers to the Steamrunner.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 1:23 pm
Last edited by Tyler on May 26th, 2011, 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Zap_ wrote:-Fed Unit analysis, Phalanx class description refers to the Steamrunner.

Does that one really matter? The Steamrunner isn't a Warp-In, but is still in the game and can be used. Being vulnerable to something should still be valid.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 1:54 pm
But it's not in mainstream multiplayer. None of the other map object ships and stations are mentioned.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:05 pm
Those are either from NPC races or are unfinished usually, neither of which cover the Steamrunner. The Steamrunner is still included in the game files for things like damage and accuracy variations, so including it in a list of ships vulnerable isn't a bad thing.

Not being available the normal way doesn't change that the game treats it like any other Fed ship.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:12 pm
The Steamrunner will be returning in a future patch in a different role and any mentions of it in the guide at the moment are erroneous :)

Thanks for the corrections :) . Unfortunately I cannot change the 'Other' description in the database to match the correct weapons range, as the current database is quite limited  :sweatdrop: . I have put a note about the strategic weapons range at the bottom of the entry for the moment :) .
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:25 pm
If you prefer to deny its existence, it still has an equaly valid entry in the Apocrypha section that needs deleting.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:32 pm
the steamy can be moved into the plans part of the apocrypha section. speaking of apocrypha, risner's bio in there mentions her s31 ties twice.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:33 pm
I consider that still relevant for the moment, as the Apocrypha section, is, well, apocryphal :) . Fits the Steamie nicely at the moment  ^-^

Another entry will be added at a later date. After all, there is a reference to the missing Okinawa and Command Cube :)
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Last edited by Tyler on May 26th, 2011, 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
But you said any mention of the ship is an error, which would mean that one's also an error. Besides, it mentions Warp-In and Tricobalts.

I don't really see why mentioning the ship is easily killed by the Phalanx is a problem, as it can still be found when pre-added to maps and doesn't reflect the artillery role it'll lose soon.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:42 pm
also in apocrypha section the lakota refit for excel1 is mentioned in the excel2 section.

and the defiant section has: the Defiant was declared as am escort unit for convoys
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:47 pm
Doesn't that fit canon? Considering that was what it was classed as, it would need to be capable of the role to not look suspicious.
posted on May 26th, 2011, 2:56 pm
Tyler wrote:Doesn't that fit canon? Considering that was what it was classed as, it would need to be capable of the role to not look suspicious.


i was correcting am to an :)
posted on May 26th, 2011, 3:06 pm
Oh, my mistake...
posted on May 26th, 2011, 4:25 pm
Myles wrote:i was correcting am to an :)

Corrected :)

The Lakota's position is fine in my opinion - the sections 'flow' a bit anyway.
1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests